EPA coal ash rule receives criticism
Neither industry nor environmentalists are happy about a new Environmental Protection Agency rule to manage coal ash, details of which were heard by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works on Wednesday.
Excerpt from The Durango Herald
By: Mariam Baksh
Read More Here: http://m.durangoherald.com/article/20150617/NEWS01/150619650/EPA-coal-ash-rule-receives-criticism
Industry representatives said the rule creates uncertainty and opens companies up to costly litigation. Environmentalists also wanted more clarity and had pushed for EPA to classify coal ash as a hazardous substance.
“Industry is probably breathing a sigh of relief – phew – that EPA will only regulate coal ash as solid waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,” said Mike Eisenfeld, New Mexico energy coordinator for the San Juan Citizens Alliance.
Eisenfeld is concerned that the “hazardous waste stream” of coal ash created by the Four Corners Power Plant is threatening the health of the San Juan River. Coal ash is created when the coal is burned.
Eisenfeld said with industry self-reporting, and because of state, federal and tribal jurisdictions, it’s really unclear who is liable for environmental damage.
General Manager of the South Texas Electric Cooperative Michael Kezar, and Frank Holleman, who testified on behalf of the Southern Environmental Law Center, seemed to agree on one point: that there should be a minimum national standard.
“Already, facilities are having to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars toward what they hope will be sufficient compliance, but with no regulatory agency endorsement of that compliance to protect them from abusive citizen suit litigation,” Kezar said.
But while Holleman praised the EPA for filling the void, Kezar wanted EPA to ratify states’ authority to design their own rules based on site-specific conditions.
“With legislation, EPA’s (coal-combustion residuals) rule can establish minimum nonhazardous waste criteria – a ‘floor’ which state regulatory programs can exceed but not fall below,” he said.
For more Information, please visit: http://m.durangoherald.com/article/20150617/NEWS01/150619650/EPA-coal-ash-rule-receives-criticism#sthash.sdjHS47f.dpuf