One Year After the Dan River Coal Ash Spill

— filed under: , , ,

A reflection of what has happened and where we need to go to address one of the most grave threats -- coal ash -- to our waterways.

One Year After the Dan River Coal Ash Spill

Dan River Coal Ash No More Excuses Meme

This is actually a column that was submitted to the Charlotte Observer to run on the anniversary of the Dan River coal ash spill (2/2/2014). And while they have graciously run our OpEds on coal ash on multiple occasions, the Editorial Board had already decided to do their own OpEd. So, here's our on where we lie in making progress on cleaning up coal ash.

 

One year after the Dan River coal ash spill, how far have we come? Look at it this way:

This past fall, the Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation ran multiple full-page ads in the Charlotte Observer to raise awareness of coal ash pollution in our region. When the advertising agency wanted to photograph a water cooler full of coal ash, they asked us to get actual coal ash. Where could we get coal ash? Oh yes, the Dan River! Even in October, months after Duke Energy announced it had “completed” a cleanup of the river, it was surprisingly easy to find coal ash still blanketing the Dan River two miles downstream of the spill and to fill up a five-gallon bucket.

But wasn’t there was a cleanup? It turns out that Duke’s “cleanup” removed only a fraction – just 7.7 percent – of the 39,000 tons of ash Duke spilled. And even that tiny figure was overstated because it includes the mud dredged from the bottom of the river in addition to the small amount of coal ash that was removed.

I didn’t know doing 7.7 percent of any job could constitute completion of a job. The coal ash left behind is plenty accessible. Rain events and the natural meandering of the river will continue to churn up coal ash and all the heavy metals and industrial waste chemicals the coal ash ponds also contained. By no means has the coal ash been buried and isolated, and anyone who thinks so needs an education in river geomorphology.

The NCGA legislation passed in August was also only a fraction of what we needed. Of the 14 unlined, leaking coal ash sites around the state – just like Dan River – the General Assembly only slated cleanups for Dan River and the three sites (near Charlotte, Asheville and Wilmington) that Riverkeepers and the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC) had initiated lawsuits against a year before the spill. Four out of 14 sites? The state left nearly three-quarters of Duke’s coal ash sites unsecured.

The state and Duke said the other 10 sites need to be evaluated by scientists and engineers. Yet, the state’s (and even Duke’s) own scientists and engineers have for years known of issues to the point that in August 2013, the state filed a lawsuit that put it in litigation against all 14 coal ash sites. At that time, the state felt like there was enough science and engineering to file a lawsuit against the nation’s largest utility.

A year later, we at least have more awareness and public concern over this grave threat to our most critical natural resource – water. But we continue to lack good, substantive progress. The solution here is simple: move these old, unlined, leaking sites away from waterways to lined storage. Why would you allow to persist a situation with drinking water sources lying downstream of gargantuan mounds of toxic material piled up to 130 feet high and spread over hundreds of acres on the banks of our waterways?

The message has been received loud and clear in South Carolina. In August 2012, the Catawba Riverkeeper and SELC secured the first coal ash cleanup, which was of an SCE&G site that continues to clean up its ash ahead of schedule. Over the next two years, two more utilities – Santee Cooper and even Duke Energy – would agree to clean up their South Carolina coal ash. The companies aren’t bankrupt. They’re not even raising rates to cover cleanup costs. Santee Cooper went so far as to call its removal of coal ash, “a win for the economy, we have several businesses investing as much as $40 million creating jobs for the economy, and it's a win for customers because it’s financially the right thing to do and it eliminates a long-term potential problem with the ponds.”

One year later, we see it didn’t take a disaster for utilities in South Carolina to fully realize the threat of coal ash and to secure statewide cleanups. If Dan River failed provide enough of a lesson in 2014, maybe Duke Energy and North Carolina in 2015 can learn a lesson from South Carolina.

Document Actions
Help Catawba Riverkeeper

Your River needs you as much as you need the River

Support Our River

Help in other ways

News
Jan 25, 2017 NC Riverkeeper Report
From the perspectives of 12 NC Riverkeepers, this report discusses how multiple environmental issues pose challenges in the pursuit of clean, plentiful water. Whether you are in North Carolina or downstream in South Carolina, read this report about the state of environmental enforcement.
Dec 13, 2016 Community Foundation of Gaston County grants $5,000 to CRF for Riverkeeper Program
The Community Foundation will fund Catawba Riverkeeper's work in Gaston County.
Dec 12, 2016 A Successful Launch of our Water Education Program at Great Falls Elementary
Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation in partnership with 4-H Clemson Cooperative Extension successfully completed our pilot Education Outreach Program with 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students from Great Falls Elementary.
Sep 27, 2016 Lake Wateree Fall Cleanup a Sweeping Success
86 volunteers collected 5,490 pounds of trash from Lake Wateree
Jun 13, 2016 Dozens of Youth Reached in Water Education Outreach Program Pilot Lessons
More news…
Report Pollution in the Catawba River

Help protect your River! 

Tell your Riverkeeper if you see:

  • Sewage Overflows
  • Failure to control sediment from construction sites
  • Illegal clearing of buffer areas
  • Fish kills 
  • Unpermitted discharges
  • Other issues that concern you

Click here to fill out a pollution report or to report water pollution to Catawba Riverkeeper by phone, call 1-888-679-9494 or 704-679-9494.  In addition, to informing your Riverkeeper, you should also report spills or contamination to federal, state and local environmental officials.

To report South Carolina water pollution call 1-888-481-0125.

To report North Carolina spills or fish kills, call your local regional Department of Environment & Natural Resources office during normal business hours (704-663-1699 for most Catawba basin areas or (828) 296-4500 for Burke, Caldwell, McDowell and other mountain counties) or 800-858-0368 after hours.  (For more information on NC spill reporting, click here)

Alliances

The Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation is a proud member of EarthShare North Carolina, the North Carolina Conservation Network, River Network and the Waterkeeper Alliance.  It also in in an alliance with Clean Air Carolina to address issues, such as sprawl, that cause air and water problems.

Clean Air / Clean Water Alliance Logo

NC Conservation Network Logo

 

EarthShare of North Carolina Logo

 

4-H Clover leaf logo

 

River Network Logo

 

SC 4H Science on the Move logo

    

wka

 
Fish Advisories

fish consumption chart crop

Fish consumption advisories have been issued throughout the Catawba-Wateree River basin.  Many of these advisories are the result of testing initiated by Catawba Riverkeeper and confirmed by state and local officials.  For a chart identifying fish types with the applicable advisories for the Charlotte area, click here.   For more information about the fish advisories, click here.

In This Section
 
715 N. Church St., Suite 120 . Charlotte, NC 28202 . Phone: 704.679.9494 . Fax: 704.679.9559