IBT Documents
Library of information about inter-basin transfer issues.
- IBT Petition
- Possible federal District Court Causes of Action
- Concord-Kannapolis IBT Document
- Lancaster IBT Opposition Map
- March, 2006 map
- 2007 IBT Resolution
- McMaster IBT Letter to Attorney General Cooper
- Materials in Support of Concord IBT from Glenn Dunn
- EMC IBT Hearing Transcript 1
- EMC IBT Hearing Transcript 2
- EMC IBT Hearing Transcript 3
- Jan. 20, 2007 Concord-Kannapolis IBT Certificate
- Upper Catawba Cities Catawba Coalition PCCH Petition for Hearing
- Memorandum in Support of State Mot. to Dis and Mot. for more Definite Statement
- Press Release by CRF
- Motion for Preliminary Injuction by SC in Supreme Court
- Concord-Kannapolis Motion to dismiss Riverkeeper Intervention
- Memo in Oposition to Motions to Dismiss and Motion for a more Definite Statement
- NC Consv Council Letter to Governor
- Concord-Kannapolis Response to RPDS Document
- Response to Riverkeeper's First RFPs
- Concord-Kannapolis Responses
- Concord-Kannapolis Expert Report
- Article: Battle Over Eastern Water
- Citizen Suit Article
- Concord-Kannapolis IBT Powerpoint
- Dr. Brzorad IBT Comments
- Dr. Fearn's Analysis
- Duke Concord-Kannapolis Letter
- Great Lakes Sustainable Water Use Aggreement
- IBT Schedule
- IBT Update Powerpoint
- Lincoln County IBT Letter to Duke
- Petition for Contested Case Hearing
- Santee Cooper FERC Application
- SC AG Injuction on Concord-Kannapolis IBT
- Updated Duke Comments on IBT
- Statement by S.C. Attorney General
- Statement by Attorney General explaining the justification for the IBT lawsuit and for opposing the 401 certification of discharge from the Duke Hydropower project.
- 2010 Con/Kan IBT Resolution Press Release
- Establishing significant reductions in the amount of water transferred out of the Catawba River during drought conditions has enabled the Protect the Catawba Coalition and Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation, Inc. to reach an agreement with the cities of Concord and Kannapolis to resolve the appeal of the Interbasin Transfer (IBT) granted Concord and Kannapolis by the State of North Carolina.
- U.S. Supreme Court Decision allowing parties to intervene
- On January 20, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision allowing Duke Energy and Catawba River Water Supply Project, but not the city of Charlotte, to intervene in the case filed by South Carolina against North Carolina in the United States Supreme Court.
- Vermont Law Review Report on Supreme Court Ruling
- IN WATER DISPUTE, U.S. SUPREME COURT DENIES MUNICIPALITY THE RIGHT TO INTERVENE, BUT ALLOWS RIGHT TO INTERVENE TO ENERGY COMPANY By Brandon Gillin
- Complete Supreme Court Settlement Agreement Language
- CRF and AR Comments on VanWyck Dam
- Comments submitted by Catawba Riverkeeper and American Rivers in opposition to the 92 acre, +1 billion gallon reservoir in Lancaster County, SC.
- EPA Comments on VanWyck Dam
- US EPA's comments raise concerns and oppose the proposed dam project.
- Joint Public Notice of Van Wyck Proposed Dam
- The original announcement requesting public comments regarding the proposed dam along the Catawba River in Lancaster County, SC.
- Bi-State Advisory Commission Letter
- Letter requesting to learn more about the proposed dam project at a special meeting on Oct. 7, 2011.
- Dec 2011 Concord Res New Customer Water Supply
- December 2011 resolution by City of Concord showing compliance with one of the terms of the IBT settlement agreement to ban additional water customers outside the municipal service limit.
