Clean Water Act 50th Year Celebration

Hank Talmadge • November 8, 2022

Clean Water Act Anniversary at NoDa Brewery

Clean Water Act Celebration


 

There was a time where rivers would catch on fire. There was a time when rivers would receive  a range of dyes from textile mills dumping into rivers. There was a time when anyone could dump anything into our waterways without punishment. This wasn’t last night at Biltmore, it was all across America, before 1972. 

The Clean Water Act passed Congress on October 4th, 1972. It passed the House by a margin of 366-11 (97%) and it passed the Senate unanimously (100%). On October 17th 1972, President Richard Nixon vetoed the bill. That same day, within a matter of hours, both chambers of Congress overrode the veto. Not only does this demonstrate how critically important the Clean Water Act is, but how conservation policy truly can be a bipartisan effort. 94% of House Republicans and 98% of House Democrats supported the measure. In the Senate, there were 31 Republicans and 41 Democrats who supported the bill. 

This landmark legislation gave us a baseline to govern the way society interacts with our water.

Some of the regulations included:

- the right forindividuals and civic groups (like Catawba Riverkeeper) the right to hold polluters accountable

- the role the federal government has in protecting our waters.

- the baseline to define water quality

- the expectation that in the event of a calamitous disaster, we have the procedures for remediating the problem to restore the waters to their previous quality.


These are but a handful of examples of how the Clean Water Act forever changed our relationships with water. 

As transformational as the Clean Water Act has been, there is still a long way to go. Corporations are still polluting the waters. The South Fork River still runs red. Our creeks are increasingly impaired. Pollution from rural and urban communities seeps into our streams and rivers. Stormwater controls are not keeping up with the rapid rate of development. The world around us is changing and our waters are not exempt. We need the laws that govern our lands and waters to be continuously updated to ensure they keep up with the changing world. Catawba Riverkeeper will continue to fight for these changes to ensure that future generations have clean waters for years to come. 



Check out the videos below to hear a little of what Riverkeeper Brandon Jones and Policy Manager Ryan Carter shared with supporters on the night of the celebration. Brandon gave perspective about the history of act and Ryan spoke about a water challenge we are facing throughout the basin, stormwater control.


Link in Bio for a petition about Stormwater Runoff Mitigation here.



Riverkeeper Brandon Jones discussing the origins of the Clean Water Act

Policy Manager Ryan Jones talking about Stormwater Runoff

May 27, 2026
On the evening of May 26th, 2026, Catawba Riverkeeper Brandon Jones attended the Charlotte City Council Public Meeting. At this meeting, he shared our organization's comments on the proposed 150-day data center moratorium. These comments can be read below. "The Catawba Riverkeeper Foundation is a member-funded environmental nonprofit that educates, advocates, and protects the Catawba-Wateree River and all its tributaries. Our organization represents over 8,000 active members and nearly 3 million citizens who rely on the watershed for drinking water, recreation, and electricity. We are concerned that the growth of local data centers may overallocate our limited resources and decrease our ability to respond to drought. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed 150-day moratorium and strongly support the staff's recommendation to adopt it. Additionally, if adopted, we recommend that the study consider a tiered approach, transparency, and net water consumption. For our water resources, the most important data center metric is net water use. A 400 MW facility—like the one now under construction on Moores Chapel Road—may actually evaporate more water indirectly than directly for cooling. The nearby Catawba Nuclear Station uses approximately 30 MGD to produce 2,300 MW or 5.2 MGD from Lake Wylie per 400 MW. However, without transparency and reporting, it is difficult to know the current impact of these data centers and almost impossible to accurately forecast the industry's future. The most accurate forecast of our region's water resources is the Catawba Wateree Water Management Group’s 2026 Integrated Water Resources Plan. Unfortunately, this plan explicitly does not include increases in water use from data centers due to limited reliable information. It is absolutely critical that our community has accurate information. We need full transparency on the planned electrical and water use of large data centers. A ban of nondisclosure agreements between elected officials and developers could help alleviate suspicion and allow communities to make informed decisions about tradeoffs. The potential direct and indirect impact s of a project should be modeled by the CWWMG to determine its actual impacts. Those impacts could be mitigated by funding water conservation projects, as some data centers have already proposed. Once operating, we need reporting on the actual water and energy use. The cumulative impact must be understood to ensure capacity and resiliency. Water withdrawers from the Catawba utilize a Low Inflow Protocol during drought to help stretch the available supply. Large data centers need conservation plans that comply with this plan. It is hypocritical to ask residents and some businesses to restrict water use while permitting facilities that cannot or will not do the same. Most years, there is plenty of water for drinking, irrigation, ecological flows, and industry in the Catawba. However, droughts such as 2001, 2007, and today expose our vulnerabilities. These droughts are more likely in a warming climate, and we are becoming less resilient with a growing population and industrial demands. Sustainable water management requires careful planning and robust coordination between users, including data centers."
By Susannah Bryant March 19, 2026
Greg Nance has had his boots on the ground since the storm subsided.
February 19, 2026
Live staking is a streambank restoration approach that reduces erosion and sediment pollution. This is the practice of planting dormant branch cuttings of native plants along streambanks (also known as riparian zones) to help hold soil in place along the waters' edge. Live stakes are planted along with native plant seeds and shrubs to create riparian buffers, which help prevent sediment from becoming a stream pollutant by securing the soil in place with good root systems. Riparian buffers also filter out other pollutants, such as chemicals, oils, fertilizers, and trash, before they enter our waterways.